After
analyzing/comparing the pages of Marshal McLuhan and Michelle Citron and two of
Henry Sidgwick’s biographies, I wondered If Wikipedia could compare to
encyclopedias such as Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Comparing and
contrasting the Wikipedia page and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy was
interesting because they were very different. Wikipedia provided broad
information while the Stanford Encyclopedia went into great detail. Wikipedia
just provided links that took you to other Wikipedia pages to go into details
about Sidgwick’s relationship within subtopics. Sidgwick’s article didn’t
include any links while McLuhan and Citron pages included links. Images weren’t
used in either of the pages and articles showing that the use of media wasn’t effective
at all. The McLuhan and Citron pages were completely unrelated except that they
both are Wikipedia pages. Due to this I was able to focus on comparing and
contrasting the details of the different Wikipedia pages. After observing both
the McLuhan and Citron page I wondered if length was important. The Citron page
was much longer and provided more information compared to the McLuhan page. McLuhan
page went into great detail about personal life while the Citron page didn’t
but only had facts in a section about her life such as date of birth and
schooling. The structure of both pages started off with their life and
background and then transitions into information about their work.
I chose to
look into the Wikipedia page of Emma Watson. I have been a fan of Emma Watson
since the first Harry Potter movie, The
Sorcerer’s Stone in 2001. Overall, I would say that this page fit’s
Wikipedia’s criteria for a featured article. The style of the page followed
Wikipedia guidelines such as it starts off with background information
summarizing the topic (Emma Watson), inclusions of headings with subheadings if
needed, and hyperlinks consistently throughout the article. The use of media proved to be effective as
well. Pictures were used throughout the article to illustrate some of Emma
Watson’s work as an actress and her throughout the years.
No comments:
Post a Comment