The first thing I noticed about Manifesto’s piece was the structure
of the text. I found it very typical for a topic such as copyrighting. He
wanted to intentionally list everything that he thought “we” should do about
copyrighting from a digital standpoint. The single sentence paragraphs were too
long at some points not showing any cohesion in the text.
Manifesto’s argument consisted of giving his audience advice. I like the
fact that he made sure to state his particular audience at the beginning of the
text. At some point in the text he was speaking to one side and asking them to
‘teach’ them about copyrighting while speaking to both at some point in the text.
As an editor, I wanted to maintain Manifesto’s voice throughout the text while
editing. I wanted the text to flow more while still having the same message to
the audience.
While editing this text it reminded me of Rebecca Jones’ “Finding the Good Argument OR why Bother With
Logic”. She states, “While many pro and con arguments are valid, they can
erase nuance, negate the local and particular, and shut down the very purpose
of having an argument”(160). Manifesto made it very clear that he was FOR or
AGAINST a specific issue. So while editing the text, I tried to regain order in
my edits to make sure everything flowed by rearranging different topics in my
edits.
The edit wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. Manifesto did a great job with this topic and it shown in his writing.
The edit wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. Manifesto did a great job with this topic and it shown in his writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment